2005.
Awaiting revision 2008
THEY USED TO BE FARMERS...
Donald Slater diversified his farm away from egg production after
he was nearly wiped out by the UK salmonella scare in the
1980s.
Successive governments have encouraged farmers to expand their
interests into farm shops, tea rooms, and ice cream parlours, so
that they are not so reliant on... well - farming.
Slater spent £350,000 (around $500,000) of borrowed money, to
create a Visitors' Centre at his farm, drawing 80,000 visitors in
the year 2000.
That was before foot-and-mouth disease returned to the UK after an
absence of 34 years.
Thanks to foot-and-mouth, Donald Slater is now expecting his losses
to top £100,000 (around $150,000) in the next few weeks.
The llamas, sheep and goats at his centre are free of the disease -
so far; but the public cannot pay him entrance fees - because of
government restrictions in response to the disease. No visitors
means no income. But he still has to pay back his loan.
Is Intensive Farming The Culprit?
Salmonella... CJD... foot-and-mouth... Is there a pattern here? Are
the benefits of intensive farming coming back to haunt us?
Who Shall We Blame?
Who are to blame - farmers, government or consumers?
If someone has to carry the can, it has to be us, the consumers.
After all, the government are striving to do what the voters want,
so they can be elected next time.
And what consumers want is, CHEAP FOOD. Especially in the UK
where we are known by our Continental neighbours as being prepared
to eat just about ANY old rubbish.
Thirty years ago the average UK family spent 50% of income on food
- today it's around 15%.
As for the farmers being to blame - they are just going where the
money is, which is their job. The European Union (EU) - as with
national governments before them - tries to play God, and distorts
markets by applying subsidies for the farmers to chase. So they do.
You really can't blame the farmers.
They have had a very tough time of it for years. They can work hard
all year only to see the value of their produce drop; so they end
up earning £10,000 or less a year - or even making a loss.
Otherwise they wouldn't be diversifying into tea rooms.
So the buck rests with the consumer - us. It is because of our love
of low food prices that intensive farming has developed and been
used so much.
And I cannot see consumer pressure changing soon.
Organic Salvation?
Of course, the organic movement will receive a boost because of
these recent crises. And that is for the good. But let's be
realistic - it will be perverted as producers chase the money. Not
everyone producing organic food will be a paid up member of
Greenpeace.
You can't have confidence in food production in any country that
can embrace a variety of tomato called 'Moneymaker' - named because
its strong skins didn't burst so easily on the way to market. The
downside of the variety? - completely tasteless!!! Many young
people must think that tomatoes have always been tasteless.
If you look hard, you can now buy "Tomatoes - chosen for taste" at
the supermarket. The implied question: "What the heck else would
consumers choose them for?!"
Foot-and-Mouth
Now foot-and-mouth has become a big election issue in the UK. Prime
Minister Tony Blair has had to juggle around his planned general
election date to try to avoid losing votes in the middle of a
crisis.
Why bother? Following his last landslide victory, no-one sees much
chance of a swing in voter sentiments anyway.
A conservative government wouldn't have behaved any differently in
such
a crisis.
Most people are aghast at the number of animals being slaughtered
to avoid spread of the disease. But let's put that in context: the
70,000 animals a week being killed for this purpose compares with
550,000 a week regularly slaughtered to feed our appetite for
meat.
The UK government - and the farmers - are desperate to maintain
their 'foot-and-mouth free' status - else very valuable export
markets will be lost. Hence the avoidance of vaccination so far,
which has the downside of preventing foot-and-mouth-free animals
being identified through testing. Vaccinated animals show positive
results in these tests. So unscrupulous traders could easily pass
off infected animals as healthy animals which have been
vaccinated.
Surely a better test procedure could be developed? Until it is,
vaccination remains an unpalatable option for countries with a
valuable 'foot-and-mouth-free' status.
But vaccination may have to be introduced to help control future
outbreaks. This was also agreed by officials in the US and Canada.
They feel it may be the only way to deal with the growing pace of
movement by animals and humans. This spreads the disease very
easily - through the air, on clothing, and on car tyres, for
example.
As for the view that "foot-and-mouth to animals is like a cold to
humans" - popularized by the UK press; this was scorned by a MAFF
(Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food) official I spoke to
yesterday. The disease consists of large vesicles - blisters -
around the mouth and hooves. These burst and can easily become
infected - by walking in mud, for example. Then you have the chance
of animals with blood poisoning walking into the food chain.
EU To Blame Again?
It's easy to blame the EU for many things - but then they do a lot
of stupid things, as do all bureaucracies. (Excuse my prejudices
surfacing...) In this instance, the regulations the EU imposed on
abattoirs encouraged the rationalization of animal slaughter in the
UK; which reduced the number of abattoirs. This meant that animals
had to travel much larger distances to be slaughtered - a major
factor in the rapid spread of the disease.
The UK government is now encouraging slaughter more locally.
Local Slaughter A Help?
Maybe for foot-and-mouth - but it's not necessarily the answer for
disease-free meat.
Local slaughter is implicated in a cluster of cases of VCJD
(Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease) - the human form of BSE (Bovine
Spongiform Encephalopathy.... Are you keeping up with this?!) In
this disease, a type of protein called a 'prion' turns the brain of
its victims to spongy matter.
Scientists love clusters of disease - they can then look for common
factors, and identify causes.
The five people in the village of Queniborough, Leicester in
central England who developed VCJD tended to buy their meat at
certain local butchers. These butchers slaughtered their own
animals, or used small abattoirs to do so, using an old-fashioned
method of slaughter. Basically (don't read this bit if you're
squeamish) this consisted of ramming a rod through the brain of the
animal to squash the spinal cord.
This method has since been banned, since it allows bits of brain
to contaminate other tissues.
The butchers also cut up brains - for sale - then, reasonably at
the time, used the same knives for cutting other parts of the
animal. This allowed cross-contamination.
The conclusions? The cluster strongly indicates the connection
between VCJD and diet.
Big deal? Well yes - it is the first step towards proof of that
connection, rather than guessing at it. Furthermore, contamination
via blood transfusion, vaccines, and occupational exposure are now
officially doubtful, at least in this case.
Return To Rural Small Scale Production?
"Phase out intensive farming" is an over-simplified answer to the
question of producing better food. Yes, some intensive farming
methods are dangerous and can be harmful. We elect governments to
regulate the methods used.
There is certainly a strong case for removing subsidies from
farming. This is one move which would present consumers with a more
accurate measure of the cost of producing food. This would
disadvantage large landowners, of course - a disproportionate
number of whom just happen to sit in the UK Houses of
Parliament.
But compelling small-scale production would not, by itself, help to
avoid foot-and-mouth, or CJD. It would just increase our imports
from other areas in the world where large scale production was
retained. So it would damage our economy for no benefit.
Foot-and-mouth has cost the UK billions of pounds. Quite apart from
the losses to farmers themselves, there are, for example, the
redundancies and bankruptcies within farming support industries,
and the huge losses to other businesses from a reduction in
tourism.
Rather than subsidizing farmers, Governments should aim to make
sure that the true costs of intensive farming methods - including
costs of any necessary government action, medical treatment, and
environmental damage - are reflected in the cost of the food
produced. The pollution of rivers and seas by chemical run-off,
springs to mind - a shocking degradation of the environment.
Then a truer indication of the real cost of food production would
be there for all to see.
The Answer To The Meat Issue
Buying 'high quality' meat is not an answer; the meat from the
butchers in the VCJD cluster village was high quality, locally
produced, expensive meat. It was not 'value beef cutlets', or
reclaimed tiny bits of meat stripped off boiled up animals'
intestines and moulded to be sold in burger bars.
What can you do?
Firstly, don't wait for farming methods to be improved. You'll wait
a long time. Take action!
As with all aspects of natural healthcare, you have to use your
common sense.
- The best option: Be vegetarian.
- Second best: Reduce meat intake dramatically. More
fruit and veg! Avoid Beef.
- Third best: Avoid
Beef.
| |
Oh, by the way, the cluster has also enabled a
better estimate of the time taken to develop VCJD; it's
thought that 10-16 years passed between the consumption of
contaminated meat and the onset of the disease.
VCJD hasn't peaked yet. In the UK, 95 cases are confirmed. Hundreds
to thousands of cases will occur in time. In France, the first 3
cases have been confirmed.
______________________
4 Recommended Detox
Methods
Many approaches to detox can work. Often, it is just a case of
which approach suits you - so you can follow it right through. Here
are 4 approaches which have been carefully thought out.
1. Herbal 90-day Detox Diet Programme
This programme consists of unique herbal products for the three
main detox organs: the Colon, the Liver and the Kidneys, as
well as a Detox Tea. The products for the 3
main detox organs are available either in Capsules or as
Drops, as you prefer. (Both are just a good - Drops are
cheaper.)
This programme lasts 3 months, which is a good length of
time. You also get unlimited free support by phone and
email. You can choose to spread the cost over 3 months if you
wish.
This reputable company has been in business since 1982. **
UNLIMITED MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE WITH THIS
PRODUCT **
2. Dr Janet Hull's
Detoxification Kit.
A 'ten step detox programme'. Dr Janet Hull cured
herself after being 'written off' by doctors.
This comprehensive 6-week detox is the result of her
experiences.
There is a 90-day conditional money-back guarantee with this
kit.
3. 12 Steps to a
Complete Body Detox.
A complete approach to detox, by Calvin Newstead.
Calvin applied detox principles to himself with tremendous
success, then left a 20-year career to promote his detox
approach.
You get the 12 steps book, and valuable information
about acid/alkaline balance, candida, gluten, and other
topics. You are entitled to free lifetime updates.
There is an 8-week unconditional money back guarantee.
4. Detox Bath -
Plus.
This is a book detailing many well-established detox methods
founded on naturopathic principles of old; including exercise,
breathing, diet, skin brushing and 'water cure'.
These have been used by successful naturopaths for
centuries.
There is a 60-day unconditional money-back
guarantee.
| 
